on 11-25-2008 10:00 AM
Hello experts,
I'm working on a memory tuning for a system ECC 6 on Windows 2003 64-bit, SQL Server.
The server is having 12GB of physical memory.
regarding the note 88416 for Zero Administration for Memory Management
I only put 1 parameter PHYS_MEMSIZE = 8GB, I set the options for SQL Server to run with fixed memory 3 GB and 1GB will be leave for the OS>
After that I found following :
- The extended Memory show in ST02 seems ok : 8GB.
- The extended Memory shows when I run sappfpar pf=...... check only show 4096MB.
I check again for the default value of em/initial_size_MB , it shows 8GB, seems to be correct if it equals to PHYS_MEMSIZE.
After reading some notes, I add another parameter em/address_space_MB = 8GB, which was 4096 by default, after that the sappfpar now show the correct value for extended memory.
I would like to understand why the sappfpar show the incorrect value like that.
Another thing, in the sappfpar, there's 2 values I hope you can make my mind clear
Process local heaps, worst case : this is the value of total_heap_area ?
Total, worst case requirement : total, minimum requirement + process local heaps, worst case, is this value should be smaller than the physical memory, or this is should be smaller than the swap space that we set in Windows ?
Many thanks for any advice,
Best regards,
Thuy
Hello - With 88416 applied memory management is dynamic. em/address_space_MB controls EM per process. Under ZAMM not required. Thus sappfpar not required.
Regards.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.