on 11-21-2008 7:20 AM
Hi All,
Investment project can be handles in two ways:
1. Assign IM to top WBS only and settle the lower WBS to its higher and so on. Finally settle top WBS to FXA.
But this creates problem with budget availability check.
Also Settlement rule creation is lengthy job for so many WBS.
2. Assign IM to all WBS, but then it has drawback of many AUCs created for one project.
Now I tried one more possibility:
Assigned different settlement profile to lower WBS which has indicator- no settlement, ticked. But in this case I am unable to transfer the lower WBS cost to higher WBS.
Can someone pl suggest if it is possible to go ahead with this method.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Maneesh
Thank You.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
case 1
this is the standard option for investment project
note that settlement rule can be automatically generated using CJB2 transaction - there is a note you need to apply to activate this option - i.e. create settlement rule to superior WBS
case 2
this is usually in my experience what usually happens in most businesses
each lowest WBS has its own AuC and hence you settle directly to AuC from the WBS
this option also allows a mix scenario where everything cannot be capitalised
if you go for this option then there is no need to settle to superior WBS
secondly the settlement rule no settlement should not be considered
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi
no need to transfer cost from lower wbs to higher wbs
top wbs has cost of total project , includes all wbs elements
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
98 | |
11 | |
11 | |
6 | |
6 | |
4 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.