cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Invoice-related requirement

Former Member
0 Kudos

Dear All,

There is one requirement:

Suppose, there is a Sales Order with Various line-items i.e.

Item --- Material -


Qty --- Rate -


UoM

10 -


Professional Fees -


5 -


7750 -


each (Rs. 7750 is per participant/ batch; & 1 batch = 3 days)

20 -


Edu. Course Mat. -


5 -


700 -


each (=> Rs. 700* 5 participant = Rs. 3,500)

30 -


Tea/ snacks----


5 -


100 -


day (=> Rs. 100* 5 participant * 3 days = Rs. 1500)

i.e. Total Order value = Rs. 7750*5 (line 10) + Rs. 3, 500 (line 20) + Rs. 1500 (line 30)

=> Rs.(38750 + 3,500 + 1500) => Rs. 43, 750

We do delivery (no matter, whether single delivery for all items or seperate deliveries/ item-wise).

Then, we generate single invoice at the completion of order.

Now, instead of capturing all 3 items in the invoice, my client's requirement is to have a single line with consolidated value for all 3 items i.e. Rs. 43,750.

Best Regards,

Amit.

Accepted Solutions (1)

Accepted Solutions (1)

former_member1042017
Active Participant
0 Kudos

Sir,

I also faced the same requirement, tried a lot but was unable to find somthing like that. BOM was the only solution we got and we applied the same.

Regards

Gaurav

Former Member
0 Kudos

Dear Gaurav,

Thanks for the confirmation.

Just one more query:

When we use BOM in Sales Order, all the components appear in S.Order (i.e. BOM: "Mat A" with 4 components. Then when we enter "Mat A" in Sales Order, all 4 components along with "Mat A" appears in Sales Order line-item level)

Similarly, When we Invoice the "Mat A" either from S.Order or Delivery; "Mat A" gets listed in Invoice, along with all 4-components.

But, the value is getting captured against "Mat A" and all 4-components are w/o any Value.

That means, Customer would come to know about full amount value against "Mat A" and will not be able to know respective components' values?

Am I right?

Best Regards,

Amit

former_member1042017
Active Participant
0 Kudos

Hi Sir,

You are absolutely right.

The amt reflected in the invoice will be in front of Mat A.

But I think this will fulfill your requirement as you only needed the same (1 complete item) in you respective invoice.

Regards

Gaurav

Answers (2)

Answers (2)

Former Member
0 Kudos

Thanks.

former_member204513
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Dear Amith,

Try with the copying routine.

Develop new copying routine as per your logic with the help of abaper then assign that in VTFL transaction at item level settings.

I hope this will help you,

Regards.

Murali.

Former Member
0 Kudos

Dear Murali,

Thanks for the suggestion.

But, I am working-around on another thought.

This is some thing like "digging and cabling for 5 Kms" and say, the total time required for completion of work is 5 days; but we have to bill everyday.

Now, to complete "digging and cabling" requires various components:

1. Labour-charges

2. cable-cost

3. Other charges

So, on day one, say work as completed for 1 km. only.

Therefore, in Invoice, it should be:

Digging and Cabling -


1--


Day--


Rs. 50000

(whereas, this price of Rs. 50,000 comes from "Labour Charge for 1 day+ cable cost, used in 1 Km.+Other chares occured in 1 day")

Best Reagrds,

Amit.

Note: Will "BOM" ful-fill this requirement?