Error in Transaction launcher - CRM 5.0 / ECC 6.0

[Former Member]

Hello all,

I am trying to pull one ECC 6.0 transaction into CRM 5.0 IC webclient through launch transaction.

When I click the link in the NavBar, I get the logon box for ECC system but after I enter the logon details below error message is getting displayed.

The transaction call failed

Reason:: Function module EWB_PROC_CREATE does not exist

But this FM exists in both CRM and ECC systems.

Any ideas about this error message?

Best Regards,

Nag

[former_member813607 · Accepted solution]

Hi Nag,

I am not familiar with this kind of error, but just want to check with you that, do you have any EEWB extensions in your CRM system ?. or can you share some more details about the procedure you have followed ?.

like,

which is the transaction you are trying to call, which is the BOR object you have used etc..

Regards, Sudeep..

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hi Sudeep,

Thanks for the reply.

I am not sure about the EEWB extensions.

Initially I created a launch transaction using BOR method the path of the ECC logical system is given as below.

http://ssever:port/sap/bc/gui/sap/its/CRM_CIC_RABOX

But now I've changed the path as: http://ssever:port/sap/bc/gui/sap/its/CCMP_RABOX

and it is working now. I am able to pull the transaction from ECC although some other data flow issues are there.

So looks like there is some issue with the serivce CRM_CIC_RABOX in our system.

Thanks to all,

Nag

[Former Member]

Used the service CCMP_RABOX instead of CRM_CIC_RABOX

[Former Member]

Hi,

we also had the same problem regarding the function module. It was solved by following the notes 888931 and 1021222.

Kind Regards,

Gitte.

[Former Member]

Hello Gurus,

I am having the same issue but the version I am using is CRM 2007 and ECC 6.0

I am getting the same message now for the transaction launcher as below

The transaction call failed Reason;; Function module EWB_PROC_CREATE does not exist

The OSS Notes doesn't suit the versions I use.

Please advice.

Thanks,

Sharath.