Application Development Discussions
Join the discussions or start your own on all things application development, including tools and APIs, programming models, and keeping your skills sharp.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Disable Conditions Tab or Menu in VA03 T-Code

Former Member
0 Kudos

First of all Thanks to the Forums, which really guided me for a long time, and this is my first post, which I was unable to get the right solution and where I am facing a lot of problems.

Hi Experts,

I have a situation to, In Va03 T-code for certain, where I need to disable all the Net Value from Item and header tables (VBAK-NETWR), (VBAP-NETWR) .

For this I used MV45AFZZ include from the program(SAPMV45A) of VA03 T-code.

I am able to solve this one, Now my problem is from the VA03 TCODE, when I display the details SO details, after disabling the Net Value, From the Menu Goto>Item>Conditions also displays the Net Value. How to disable this Conditions tab Completely. By disabling the Menu is not the requirement but after entering into the item data, One should not have the access to the Conditions Tab...

Can anyone please suggest me where I need to write the code.

The T-code for the Conditions tab is 'T\05'. I am unable to write th FCODE or SY-UCOMM at the right location.

Please help me ASAP.

Thanks For Reading My Query Completely.

Regards,

Dileep .C .

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

former_member181995
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Try with screen/transaction varients from SHD0 for field disable.

4 REPLIES 4

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi

Answer is assumption.

I think you can disable fields using Config also, pls check with your functional consultant

Regards

Madhan

former_member181995
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Try with screen/transaction varients from SHD0 for field disable.

0 Kudos

What is the use the SHD0 Tcode.

anyone can please advice me where to write the code in the

MV45AFZZ for my requirement above mentioned.

Thanks regards,

Dileep .C

Former Member
0 Kudos

Unable to understand the replies. So posted again because my thread already moved to 5 pages back.