cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Table not initializing during phase ACT_700

troy_sorbet
Participant
0 Kudos

During the the upgrade from 4.7 to ERP 2005 phase ACT_700 I get the following error: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

DDIC ACTIVATION ERRORS and RETURN CODE in SAPAA70016.TST

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

1 ETP111 exit code : "8"

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

DDIC ACTIVATION ERRORS and RETURN CODE in SAPAAAA700.TST

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

1EEDO519X"Table" "IFMREP1AX" could not be activated

1 ETP111 exit code : "8"

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

DDIC ACTIVATION ERRORS and RETURN CODE in SAPAAAB700.TST

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

1 ETP111 exit code : "8"

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

DDIC ACTIVATION ERRORS and RETURN CODE in SAPAB70015.TST

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

1 ETP111 exit code : "8"

I went in the regular system to activate the table but that has no affect, when I try to log on to the shadow system I got blocked with "Upgrade logon not possible" I looked in the ACT_UPG.log and the error is in german which doesn't do a lot of for me,

3 DDT012XAktiviere Tabelle "IFMREP1AX"

3 DDT405 Kein Cust.- bzw. SAP-Include "CI_FMFINCODE" vorhanden

3 DDT405 Kein Cust.- bzw. SAP-Include "CI_FMFCTR" vorhanden

3 DDT405 Kein Cust.- bzw. SAP-Include "CI_FMCI" vorhanden

3 DDT405 Kein Cust.- bzw. SAP-Include "CI_SUBSTR" vorhanden

2WDDT191 Erweiterungskat. "3" möglich, aber Include oder Subtyp ist noch unklassif.

1EDDT963 Feld "BOSSID" in Tabelle "IFMREP1AX" ist doppelt (Bitte überprüfen)

1EDDT963 Feld "CNAME" in Tabelle "IFMREP1AX" ist doppelt (Bitte überprüfen)

1EDDT963 Feld "FINUSE" in Tabelle "IFMREP1AX" ist doppelt (Bitte überprüfen)

1EDDT963 Feld "FIVOR" in Tabelle "IFMREP1AX" ist doppelt (Bitte überprüfen)

1EDDT963 Feld "FNAME" in Tabelle "IFMREP1AX" ist doppelt (Bitte überprüfen)

1EDDT963 Feld "FUND_TYPE" in Tabelle "IFMREP1AX" ist doppelt (Bitte überprüfen)

1EDDT963 Feld "FUND_TYPET" in Tabelle "IFMREP1AX" ist doppelt (Bitte überprüfen)

1EDDT963 Feld "PNAME" in Tabelle "IFMREP1AX" ist doppelt (Bitte überprüfen)

1EDDT963 Feld "POTYP" in Tabelle "IFMREP1AX" ist doppelt (Bitte überprüfen)

1EDDT963 Feld "SPONSOR" in Tabelle "IFMREP1AX" ist doppelt (Bitte überprüfen)

3 DDT013 Tabelle "IFMREP1AX" wurde nicht aktiviert

Is there a way to connect to the shadow instance so that I can attempt to activate the tables.

Thanks in Advance

Troy

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (6)

Answers (6)

troy_sorbet
Participant
0 Kudos

Thanks for the tip on the unlock, I was able to get in when I did I found that the table has duplicate fields, by looking at the table using the expand field list option I found the fields repeated in an append. Looking to see how to remove those now.

Troy

troy_sorbet
Participant
0 Kudos

Thanks for the responses folks, I didn't get notices so I will answer what is asked. I tried both a repeat and an init, the outcome is still the same. I tried logging in as DDIC and the user I created in order to run SPDD during the phase ACT_700. I am going to try the unlock and see if the listed table is activated in the shadow instance.

Troy

former_member235680
Active Participant
0 Kudos

Troy,

Which login credentials are you using to login to the shadow system? You can only login to shadow system, using DDIC only.

You can repeat the same phase again. Sometimes it clears the propblem automatically. More queries are welcome.

Cheers

Abhi

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Troy,

The message 'logon not possible - upgrade in progress' means the shadow instance is still locked for logon. You need to unlock the shadow instance so you can log on to it - 'SAPup unlockshd' from '/usr/sap/put/bin'. Did you try 'repeat' on ACT_700 - I'd do that first as I've seen sometimes where that error occurs and a 'repeat' fixes it magically.

Regards,

Sheryl.

troy_sorbet
Participant
0 Kudos

Yes we did include support packs for the sytsem, we didn't have any warnings concerning this object with prepare. Prepare ran clean before we kicked off the upgrade.

Troy

Former Member
0 Kudos

Did you included support packs during the upgrade?

In prepare did you got any warnings at all?