cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

/101, /110 & /560 not appearing in payroll log after assigning Cumu Assg

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Gurus,

I am working on INTERNATIONAL PAYROLL and have maintained

Cumulation Classes : 01 & 02

Processing Classes : 05 with specification 3 Transfer in summarized form

20 with specification 3 RT Storage and cumulation

30 with specification 1 Amt and no. of wage type to be cumulated in current year

41 with specification 3 RT storage and cumulation

for my wage types..NB10,NB20, NB30 & NB40.

But in payroll log the wage types /101, /110, /560 etc are not reflecting...

Table RT

A Wage Type APC1C2C3aBKoReBTAwvTvNOne Amount/One Number Amount

  • /840 Diff. to av01 132.00

3 /001 Valuation b01 71

3 /002 Valuation b01 71

3 NB10 BASIC SALAR01 15,000

3 NB20 HOUSING ALL01 1,000

3 NB30 TRANSPORTAT01 700

3 NB40 VARIABLE AL01 300

Please guide what else is required to get those wage types in log...

Regards,

Kumarpal Jain

Accepted Solutions (1)

Accepted Solutions (1)

harishtk1
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Have you maintained IT 0008 and/or IT 0014 with any wagetypes and amounts before processing payroll?

Former Member
0 Kudos

I have maintained 0008,

that is how in payroll log my wage types are apppearing with amounts...

NB10, NB20, NB30 & NB40

Rgrds,

Anil Kumar

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi,

First: Please remove the 41processing class, and run the payroll and check the log.

I think you should not do any specification for Processing Class 41, leave it as blank. That may be the problem.

Other wise: copy your wage types from Master Wage type once again and check it.

This will solve your problem.

Please award points if it is useful.

Regards

Venu

harishtk1
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Sorry, my mistake. I think Processing Class 20 should do it. Have you checked in Payroll log what is happening in rule X023? Are your wagetypes being processed here?

Also at which stage are you checking the payroll Log? is it at the end of the payroll process or somewhere before the above rule is called?

Edited by: Harish Krishnan on Oct 7, 2008 5:35 PM

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Harish,

Thanks a lot for the interest in helping me and It worked automatically...

But another issue: wage type /560 and /565 are cumulating double the net pay.....

I have no idea whether its correct or not...but pls guide how to fix it...

I would really appreciate if you can give an idea abt the numbers accumulated against /001, /002 and /840.

What are these number Hrs (used as factors)or Amounts????

It is at the Final Processing, following is the log :

Final processing

XCODI XCD0 Cost Distribution

Input

Table WPBP

No From To Action Action Cust. Empl.

01 01.01.2008 31.01.2008 HR Hiring HSA 3

Table RT

A Wage Type APC1C2C3aBKoReBTAwvTvNOne Amount/One Number Amount

  • /101 Total gross 17,000

    • /840 Diff. to av01 132.00* 17,000

  • /845 Total paid 01 17,000

3 /001 Valuation b01 71

3 /002 Valuation b01 71

3 NB10 BASIC SALAR01 15,000

3 NB20 HOUSING ALL01 1,000

3 NB30 TRANSPORTAT01 700

3 NB40 VARIABLE AL01 300

  • /110 Net payment 17,000

  • /550 Statutory n 17,000

  • /700 Wage/salary 17,000

    • /560 Payment Amo 34,000*

    • /565 Carry-over 34,000*

Thanks & Regards,

KPJ

harishtk1
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

/001 and /002 are normally hourly rate for calculations during prorating, or during overtime calculations etc.

regarding /560 and /565... You must not have maintained Bank Details for this employee and this must be the second months payroll you are processing. As payment can be made only via .559, if it is not formed in a period, it is carried over in .565 to next period, and in next period, the carried over figure is added to /560 and again attempted to be paid. Looks like, even now .559 is not formed.

So check bank details infotype.

Former Member
0 Kudos

Thanks a lot Harish for the help..

It has clarified my doubts and solved my query....

thanks a lot....

Best Regards,

KPJ

Answers (0)