on 09-29-2008 9:53 AM
Experts
Can somebody guide me, with advantages and disadvantages of implementing Cartesis Vs SEM BCS solution in major business scenarios ?
e.g Comparitive study of these two tools on diffrent business aspects.
I'm afraid, you'll not find any comparative study yet.
The general opinion that was said rather many times already: Cartesis is more user friendly and less functional than SEM-BCS (meaning that BCS may cope with more complicated consolidation cases).
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
This question keeps popping up - doesn't anyone use the 'search' function? - so I'll repeat what I posted, paraphrasing a discussion with a SAP sales director in Australia:
SAP SEM-BCS is supported until 2013.
but SAP now owns 3 consolidation tools, each is currently valid.
- BCS,
- BPC (from Outlooksoft) and
- Cartesis (from Business Objects) all perform consolidation,
Each has its pros and cons;
- BCS - very good consolidation engine but not so user-friendly.
- BPC - user-friendly but not so good consolidation, also has a non-SAP layout.
- Cartesis - better consolidation engine than BPC but not as good as BCS. More user-friendy than BCS but not as good as BPC, again non-SAP layout.
Although each is currently valid, there will be a combination of the best of all 3 in a new product with a SAP layout (or the same new product will be combined into a new release under the name of an existing product) at a date to be determined.
User | Count |
---|---|
12 | |
4 | |
3 | |
2 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.