F110 - S_BTCH_ADM
Some of our users are facing an issue when using tcode F110. The missing authorization (SU53 screen) indicates S_BTCH_ADM 'Y" is required. We are hesistant assigning this object because of the sensitive nature. Please advise. Thank you
Julius von dem Bussche replied
> Another investigation method (as the trace might also give false indications in some transactions) is to create a temporary bugfix role with S_BTCH_ADM and assign it to the user.
That would be helpfull to be able to use SU53 a second time => to evaluate the last failed authority check immediately prior to the S_BTCH_ADM check.
But in this case (from a trace) you only need to look once at how the authority-check is performed in the job scheduler and you understand it forever...
Basically, S_BTCH_ADM is an "override" for S_BTCH_JOB. Probably S_BTCH_JOB job_action "RELE" is missing.