on 09-20-2008 6:06 PM
Hi Experts
Any help on this is highly appreciated.Our Fiscal year 2008 is ending on 27th september and fiscal year 2009 will start on 28th September.
We have some purchase orders created with delivery date as 30th september which falls into next fiscal year. Somehow these purchase orders are not appearing as commitments in KOB2 report even with data ranges for next fiscal year.
However we have many similar Purchase orders with delivery date in fiscal year 2008 with same internal order as account assignment and they are correctly appearing as commitments in KOB2 report.
Can you please let us know what could be the reason for purchase orders with delivery date as 30th september not appearing in KOB2 report.
Regards,
Santosh
Hi, Are you using the same GL Account for these two different scenario? Pl check whether the GL account which you are using, has been extended to Controlling as Cost Element. Trust this helps much! Cheers,
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Ashok
Thanks for your continued support on this. I was going through these notes today.
One observation I made was cost elements in our system were valid till 27th september only when problematic POs were created.However their validity was subsequently extended after the creation of Purchase orders.This might be the reason for system not recognising these POs as commitments.
SAP Note 534993 seems to suggest that we need to run report RKANBU01 for all such purchase orders to redetermine commitments.I am in the process of testing this out in our systems.
Could you please let me know if my understanding is correct. Thanks again.
Regards,
Santosh
Hi Ashok
Thanks a lot for your help on this. Application of note 534993 solved our problem. After running report RKANBU01 for problematic POs, I am able to see all the missing commitments in the report.
However I feel SAP could have defined logic of the report to change automatically when validity of cost elelments got extended instead of we applying this note manually to correct changes. Hopefully they might correct this through future support patches.
Thanks again for your help.
Regards,
Santosh
User | Count |
---|---|
88 | |
7 | |
6 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
2 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.