Condition types PB00 and PBXX

[Former Member]

Dear Experts,

1) Can anybody please explain that can we use Condition type PB00 in number of Pricing procedures. like i have three pricing procedures, local purchase, Import Purchase,

External Service Pricing procedure.

what is recommend, eiether to use same one (PB00) or maintain seperate condition type for each Pricing procedure ?

2) What is the difference between Condition type PB00 and PBXX ?

Waiting for your valuable reply

Thanks in Advance

[former_member529134 · Accepted solution]

Hello Kiran

Both PB00 and PBXX are condition types for Gross Price.

PB00 is for automatic capture of gross price and PBXX for manual entry of gross price.

ie if you are purchasing a material for the first time, the condition type PBXX for gross proce will be hit and you have to manually enter the gross price in the conditions tab in the PO.

But if u have a condition record for that particular combination for PB00 it will be picked.

You might have noticed the manual tick for the PBXX condition type in the pricing procedure. That means user has to manually enter the gross price.

Also there is a column 'requirement' which will be having 6 against condition type PBXX. That '6' means condition exclusion, ie it makes sure that both PB00 and PBXX never comes together.

And you can use the same PB00 and PBXX for your all pricing procedures whether it is local or import.

Hope youur doubts are cleared.

[Former Member]

Dear,

The difference between pricing conditions PB00 and PBXX is :

PB00- automatic pricing - can be used for automatic pricing determination

PBXX- manual pricing - used for manual pricing.

When you maintain the pricing condition for the PO, the system will look at the available condition records (for PB00) and make the automatic pricing determination. In case, such condition records were not defined, then it is mandatory that you have to maintain manually the pricing condition where PBXX will be automatically defaulted in replacement for PB00.

Regards,

Syed Hussain.