BPM - Par for each

[Former Member]

I am having some issues with my Par for Each block in my BPM.

My scenario is File(CSV format) --> BPM --> IDOC.

The BPM will receive the file and it will convert the incoming message into IDOC and in the Parforeach Block I am sending the IDOC to R/3.

Currently in my file I am having around 1300 Records.

I am seeing the following error message in the Message Monitoring

Work Item 000000015782 :Object Flowitem method cannot be executed

Error When Processing Node 00000000023 (Parforeach index 00000000)

Parforeach table element contains 1268 entries

Error when creating a component of type "dynamischer paraller abschint"

Error When Processing Node 00000000023 (Parforeach index 00000000)

Error during result processing of work item 00000015784

Question

-

---

Whats the problem ? Previously when I ran for few records it ran fine? so the Parforeach is unable to handle the load? Where to increase the limit.

thanks for your help.

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hi Jenni,

Check this...

A ParForEach is recommended if:

· The number of parallel processing branches is less than 999 (the multiline table element that is processed in the ParForEach contains less than 999 lines).

http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/ce/bb2c421f3fda2ce10000000a1550b0/content.htm

Regards

Anand

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Thanks Anand. That has resolved my problem.

I have another question, in the message monitoring for each IDOC am sending I have corresponding message, that means in this case I see 1268 messages,(because in my file I have 1268 Records), if there is any way to control this. or this is common?

thanks for your help.

Jenni

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hi Jenni,

Consider idoc packaging...

Have look at this note and thread...

814393

Regards

Anand

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

HI Anand,

I Looked into the 814393 and it gives answer for my question.

But the URL you have mentioned is highlighting about the JDBC? Did you mention the correct URL or its a TYPO

Please help me.

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hi Jenni,

I just quoted similar example, it's JDBC->Idoc instead of File->Idoc.

Also have a look at this michal's weblog on idoc bundling...

/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/12/04/xi-idoc-bundling--the-trick-with-the-occurance-change

Regards

Anand

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Thanks Anand. The Weblog 2762 really helped me to resolve the issue.

Thanks Again.