on 09-17-2008 3:22 PM
Hi,
Is it possible to create a document type which is non MRP relevant? For instance, if we place an article XXXXXX in a NB purchase order, the article XXXXXX is MRP relevant and will be listed in MD04.
Is it now possible to create the article XXXXXX in for instance a ZUB purchase order and that it won't be listed in MD04?
We want to do this because we create a large order on which we place call offs. Now I know we could work with scheduling agreements, but it is in one way or another possible to create a purchasing document in which items are non MRP relevant?
Hi,
The relevancy doesn't depend on the document type. If you create a PO with account assignment, the PO won't appear on MRP list (generally). If you receive goods against this PO your stock won't change (increanse).
You should describe your business requirement because I don't think that scheduling agreement and PO that doesn't appear on MRP list are sensible alternatives for the same solution.
Regards,
Csaba
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Thank you very much for your respons. I have marked this question as answered. Although, I do have a kind of extra simular question: can we somewhere change that a certain account assignment is stock dependent. Meaning, we create a PO to acc assgnmnt P (project with WBS element). If we then receive the stock via MIGO, the stock hasn't increased.... Thx!
Hi
Just check the material type setting in SPRO. Logistic-general-material master-basic setting-material type-Define attributes of material types. Execute, select the material type and check quantity/value updating option. Inside u will find a check box for qty updating. Just see if it is checked?
Hi Csaba,
1. Yes, I do see any value but those are the non WBS-stock material.
2. Yes, I am using the proper organisational levels.
It really doesn't show the special stock.
Hi BNR, I This is indeed the answer.
Thanks, Peter
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Yes, it was indeed. I have rewared you with points for 'very helpfull answer' because I could not check 'solved problem' due to the fact that this was already checked for the first part of this topic.
Aha, I have the solution: I reward you for your reply also. That means you even have 12 points which is more than 10...
Thanks again, Peter
Edited by: Peter Panis on Sep 24, 2008 1:44 PM
User | Count |
---|---|
95 | |
11 | |
11 | |
6 | |
6 | |
4 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.