cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Consignment Pick up VL02n message VL150

david_schultz
Explorer
0 Kudos

Hello, we have been watching threads regarding Schedule Line Category F1 for Consignment Pick Up returns movement type 632.

We have changed config VOV6 for F1 to include Movement Type 655 to allow stock posting directly to Q stock.

The tests we performed in our development client worked well. 655 movement type brought stock from our Customer directly into Q stock within our plant.

In our "Production live copy" we receive message VL150 at time of PGR. The transaction fails.

We reviewed VL21, and there are no other deliveries competing for this material.

We are running ECC6 with latest support packs.

Comparison of PRD and DEV client config, along with masterdata is identical.

Any insight would be greatly appretiated.

Accepted Solutions (1)

Accepted Solutions (1)

david_schultz
Explorer
0 Kudos

In VOV6 for Schedule line category F1, 655 movement type consignment pick up, I see in "transaction flow" the Availability V_TVEP box is selected.

Process works well in our development client (no MRP activity)

Process does not work at all in PRD client (allot of MRP activity)

Dear SAP guru's : Should Avalability check box be de-selected for Returns ?

I recognize that Sched. Line Category DN Returns does not have this box ticked.

Please advise of your thoughts.

regards, Dave

Shiva_Ram
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi,

That is correct, there is no need to check the box Availability for the returns schedule line category. So it looks one of the transport request was not transported to production system.

Regards

Edited by: Shiva Ram on Sep 11, 2008 2:49 PM

Answers (3)

Answers (3)

david_schultz
Explorer
0 Kudos

Lakshmipathi,Ram,

Thank you for your quick responses. Our decision for us to use movement type 655 in the Schedule Line Confg for F1, we chose inspection type 05 to allow PGR to go directly to Q stock.

Yes both Dev and Prd client MM03 masterdata for QM is the same.

Regards, Dave

Lakshmipathi
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Dear David

As rightly asked by Shiva Ram, you have not indicated whether in material master Quality Management view, you have maintained Inspection Type 06. Please check and compare in development client with production client.

thanks

G. Lakshmipathi

Shiva_Ram
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi,

You have mentioned that the master data are similar.

Does that include the material master QM view data?

Regards