Application Development Discussions
Join the discussions or start your own on all things application development, including tools and APIs, programming models, and keeping your skills sharp.
cancel
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

transaction used not in logging

Go to solution
Former Member

‎09-03-2008 11:01 AM

0 Kudos

Hi,

Is it possible that a transaction called by an other transaction is not registered in the log files? I got the impression that if the called transaction is not in SE97 or is there not marked as to check, it is not in the logging as a transaction started.

Have fun

Bye Jan van Roest

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Go to solution
Former Member

‎09-03-2008 4:57 PM

0 Kudos

SE97 does not show all called transaction codes so I would not rely upon it fully.

4 REPLIES 4

Go to solution
Former Member

‎09-03-2008 11:07 AM

0 Kudos

Hi,

I forgot to mention that it is a SAP R/3 4.6c system.

Bye Jan van Roest

Go to solution
Former Member

‎09-03-2008 11:08 AM

0 Kudos

Which log are you referring to?

If it's the security audit log: In older releases it showed up as a failed transaction start .

This was corrected and is now a successfull transaction start - which is what it is...

Additionally, an entry is written to the developer trace.

Cheers,

Julius

Go to solution
Former Member

‎09-03-2008 4:57 PM

0 Kudos

SE97 does not show all called transaction codes so I would not rely upon it fully.

Go to solution
Former Member
In response to Former Member

‎09-03-2008 5:01 PM

0 Kudos

> 

> SE97 does not show all called transaction codes so I would not rely upon it fully.

It will show all "okay" transaction codes if you use function module AUTHORITY_CHECK_TCODE, but unfortunately that is not consistently the case.

Cheers,

Julius